This website uses certain Blogger and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense cookies, and other data collected by Google. By remaining on this site, your consent is implied.

January 16, 2017: Just as I predicted would eventually happen (back on December 16, 2014), the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has ended their search for the MH370 plane crash wreckage in their search area without ever finding MH370 in it: Underwater search of 120,000 square-kilometre area in the southern Indian Ocean completed. Wreckage of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 not found there. Malaysia, China and Australia announce decision to suspend the underwater search. "Paul Kennedy, the project director of Fugro – the Dutch company leading the search – acknowledged on Thursday [July 21, 2016] that, if the plane was not found there, "it means it's somewhere else"."

Translate

Friday, May 16, 2014

MH370

MH370 "vanished" 10 weeks ago today, after taking off on March 07, 2014, from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, heading to Beijing, China.

Myself and others have questions that aren't being answered by the investigators. Other than CNN, I don't see any news organizations asking questions.

I decided to create this blog, to post facts and links from reliable sources, as well as to post some of my own research based on facts that are in the public domain.
Posted by at
Labels:

4 comments:

  1. LindaTCMay 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM

    (not sure if I am posting in the correct part of the blog ...you can move it as appropriate)

    the following was reported 2 days ago, but not in the Guardian so I am posting it in your blog ...


    Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: Scientists question methods and the politics of the MH370 search

    UNDERWATER scientists have labelled the search for MH370 a “debacle” and say Prime Minister Tony Abbott was playing politics when he prematurely announced the black box pingers had been found.

    The acoustic experts, who do not wish to be identified, said the four crucial signals detected by a US pinger locator were almost certainly not from the missing Malaysian Airlines plane’s black boxes, but from another man-made source.

    They insisted that the signals were in the wrong frequency and detected too far apart to be from the boxes.

    “As soon as I saw the frequency and the distance between the pings I knew it couldn’t be the aircraft pinger,” one scientist told News Corp Australia.

    That conclusion is supported by the lack of success from a detailed search of the area conducted by the US deep sea drone ‘Bluefin 21’.

    read more here ... http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-scientists-question-methods-and-the-politics-of-the-mh370-search/story-fnizu68q-1226928975742

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJuly 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM

    What seems to have been missed in this affair is that tracking an aircraft by tansponder pings is not actually tracking an aircraft - all that you're tracking is a piece of electronic kit that can be taken out and placed in another aircraft or any other vehicle for that matter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simon GunsonFebruary 21, 2016 at 10:31 PM

    Interesting that you do not identify yourself. Does that mean you do not stand by what you say?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Simon GunsonFebruary 21, 2016 at 10:51 PM

    I would have thought Bob Hogue that a reputable man accusing another (Zaharie) of murder would have the good conscience to say so openly?

    ReplyDelete

I am using comment moderation and word verification to prevent spam. If you want to provide information, but remain anonymous, please state that at the beginning of your comment, and I will not publish it.

If you want to communicate with me, either use the Contact Form or leave your email in a comment and I will contact you but not publish it. I do not use Twitter, Facebook, etc. therefore I am unable to communicate with you using those.

I appreciate any useful information relevant to the disappearance of MH370.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)